radiationstation

RADIOACTIVE SVALBARD: ‘Very low levels,’ possibly from Russian reactor, detected this month at stations near Longyearbyen and in Finnmark

Read Time:1 Minute, 48 Second

It’s not Chernobyl, Three Mile Island or probably even a trip to the dentist, but there’s something a bit strange in the air.

A small amount of radioactivity was detected earlier this month at monitoring stations near Longyearbyen and Kirkenes, according to the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. The amount is not considered hazardous and the organization stated the source is still being determined.

“On both June 7 and 8, very low levels of radioactivity iodine were found at the CTBTO station in Svalbard,” the agency reported in a statement. “The CTBTO monitors the Nuclear Testing Agreement. The station hosted by NORSAR and DSA analyzes data coming from there. The level measured does not pose any risk to health or environmental damage. We are intensifying the monitoring of radioactivity in the air and conducting investigations to determine where the emission originates.”

However, The Independent Barents Observer, quoting health officials from The Netherlands and a “nuclear campaigner” with Greenpeace Russia, reported the radionuclides appear to have come from western Russia and the composition of the isotopes strongly indicates the source is associated with a nuclear reactor.

The Svalbard monitoring station is 18 kilometers from Longyearbyen. Radiation was also detected the same week at the Viksjøfjell station near Kirkenes. They are part of a global network of stations that monitor compliance with the test ban treaty.

It’s not the first time Russia has been responsible or suspected of activity resulting in radiation leaks in Svalbard. Almost exactly a year ago a team of Norwegian and Russian researchers visited the site where a Russian nuclear sub sank in 1989 near Bjørnøya to determine if radiation was leaking from the nuclear reactor and warheads within the vessel 1,700 meters beneath the surface.

Previous Russian studies in the early 1990s and 2007 showed there have been small radioactive discharges from the reactor and the submarine has major damage. Monitoring is expected to continue in the future because the plutonium has a half-life of 24,000 years, but researchers said it’s unlikely the contamination will infiltrate the food chain because there is very little marine life at the sub’s depth.

 

About Post Author

Mark Sabbatini

I'm a professional transient living on a tiny Norwegian island next door to the North Pole, where once a week (or thereabouts) I pollute our extreme and pristine environment with paper fishwrappers decorated with seemingly random letters that would cause a thousand monkeys with a thousand typewriters to die of humiliation. Such is the wisdom one acquires after more than 25 years in the world's second-least-respected occupation, much of it roaming the seven continents in search of jazz, unrecognizable street food and escorts I f****d with by insisting they give me the platonic tours of their cities promised in their ads. But it turns out this tiny group of islands known as Svalbard is my True Love and, generous contributions from you willing, I'll keep littering until they dig my body out when my climate-change-deformed apartment collapses or they exile my penniless ass because I'm not even worthy of washing your dirty dishes.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %
nocovid19svalbard Previous post ZERO COMPARISON: Svalbard/Jan Mayen is WHO’s only ‘zone’ w/ no COVID-19 cases – except Turkmenistan and North Korea (which experts say are lying) and some very tiny islands
minus10days Next post UNLUCKY SEVEN: A new study takes Longyearbyen’s ‘warming faster than anywhere’ claim to yet another level – twice the Arctic average and seven times the Earth’s