glacierwater

‘Would you pay £80 for a bottle of WATER?’ Svalbarði’s big-time success also means big-time scorn

Read Time:3 Minute, 57 Second

Plenty of folks are toasting Jamal Qureshi’s success, although most probably aren’t doing it with his product. Plenty are indifferent about the rich choosing to literally piss their money away. And plenty are predictably reacting with ridicule and rage.

waterbottle
Custom bottles are part of the “super-premium” concept of Svalbarði water. Photo courtesy of Svalbarði.

His bet that people would be willing to pay mega money for a 750-milliliter bottle of melted ice from Svalbard’s glaciers is paying off big time, perhaps most noticeably this week as the London luxury department store Harrods debuted the water that goes by the quirky name of Svalbarði.  The announcement sparked headlines worldwide and – as might be expected – it’s the £80 price tag (twice the 400-kroner price in Svalbard) that’s causing a mental meltdown.

“If you think bottled water is a rip-off when you can get it straight from the tap, then you might want to look away now,” begins an article in Pakistan Today headlined  “Would you pay £80 for a bottle of WATER?”

The article, like most, ultimately calms down and details the huge expense and difficulty of collecting and purifying the glacier ice, and that production is limited to 13,000 bottles a year. It also quotes claims by Qureshi’s company such as Svalbarði being the “purest ever” and throws in tidbits such as “Matt Damon is said to be a fan” after a trip to the archipelago. But the way different publications are presenting such details is as wide-ranging as the gap between the haves and the have-nots.

The financial magazine Forbes is expectedly complimentary, with sentences such as “The 750ml bottle looks more like a bottle of wine than water. The mint-colored ring around the top symbolizes the polar rings and the wooden bottle top symbolizes drift wood.”

If you’re looking for something unusual other than packets of tea or chocolates on your next visit to the Harrods Food Hall, the Svalbarði water is certainly uncommon,” the article concludes. The water is being sold during a three-day exhibition at the store’s food hall this week and retail sales are scheduled to begin in March.

Then there’s the detractors, for whom Svalbarði’s is a product with no taste that’s in bad taste.

“‘Luxury water’ for £80 a bottle? It’s ignorant, insensitive and irresponsible,” is the headline of a column in The Guardian by Katherine Purvis. She notes bottled water is responsible for a tremendous amount of pollution, 1.5 million barrels of oil are used annually to produce it and “icebergs don’t need yet more human interference – no matter how small the scale – to speed up the melting process.”

“Surely the most problematic aspect of this product is the sheer insensitivity of exploiting one of the world’s last wildernesses, and charging such a high price for its product?” she wrote. “This, while 663 million people currently live without safe water.”

Qureshi, whose in other articles notes the company donates money for every bottle sold to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, told The Guardian he understands people are concerned about the environmental sustainability of the product.

“But we’re carbon neutral certified, and we’re supporting renewable energy projects in East Africa and China,” he said. “We also only take icebergs that are already floating in the water and would usually melt in a few weeks, and that can’t be used for hunting (by polar bears).”

Nearly 200 reader comments were posted as of Thursday afternoon,

“This is obviously a piece of pointless gratuitous consumerism,” wrote a commenter with user name of FFC800. “But the actions we all take in everyday life are going to have a much bigger negative effect on ice volume than 30 tonnes a year. If the rich want to waste their money on something which is carbon offset and which has no local environmental impact either, I’m fine with that.”

Others were decidedly less willing to live and let live.

“Any P.O.s buying this stuff ought to be drowned with it,” wrote a commenter with the name of Dean Hetherington.

Purvis was also the target of some scorn, both for her overall argument and certain passages such “astonishingly, the governor of Svalbard has approved Qureshi’s venture.”

“Svalbard’s main industry is coal mining,” wrote a commenter with the name of woodchopper, citing a Wikipedia article that is outdated due to the recent collapse of the industry here. “If you are actually astonished that after accepting coal mining they’d stop someone from bottling some water from icebergs that would soon melt anyway you should perhaps do some more background reading before writing an article.”

 

 

About Post Author

Mark Sabbatini

I'm a professional transient living on a tiny Norwegian island next door to the North Pole, where once a week (or thereabouts) I pollute our extreme and pristine environment with paper fishwrappers decorated with seemingly random letters that would cause a thousand monkeys with a thousand typewriters to die of humiliation. Such is the wisdom one acquires after more than 25 years in the world's second-least-respected occupation, much of it roaming the seven continents in search of jazz, unrecognizable street food and escorts I f****d with by insisting they give me the platonic tours of their cities promised in their ads. But it turns out this tiny group of islands known as Svalbard is my True Love and, generous contributions from you willing, I'll keep littering until they dig my body out when my climate-change-deformed apartment collapses or they exile my penniless ass because I'm not even worthy of washing your dirty dishes.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
coastguardrescue Previous post Briefs from Svalbardposten for the week of Feb. 14, 2017
tovewebstory Next post Treasured Tove: Concerts and auction in Mine 3 Saturday night to help former Svalbard resident with MS