Press "Enter" to skip to content

Finnair grounded: Norway refuses to allow direct flights between Helsinki and Svalbard, citing 1978 agreement

0 0
Read Time:1 Minute, 59 Second

Finnair has cancelled plans to offer direct flights between Helsinki and Longyearbyen this summer after Norway’s government refused to authorize the route, citing a 1978 agreement between Norway and Finland that prohibits the latter country from offering flights to the archipelago.

The airline has three weeks to appeal the decision by Norway’s Civil Aviation Authority. But  Päivyt Tallquist, the airline’s communications director, said the decision has already been made to cancel this summer’s flights even if a decision is made to appeal the decision or amend the agreement.

“We can not let our customers live in uncertainty,” she told High North News. “They need predictability and therefore we are giving them a refund for already purchased tickets now. This is very unfortunate.”

The first-ever flights to Svalbard by Finnair were scheduled between June 1 and Aug. 27. The airline was also promoting the flights to travelers coming to and from Asia on newly established routes, at least of which may now be put on hold.

Both the Norwegian government’s rejection and the airline’s cancellation were quickly and harshly criticized by local and regional tourism officials, as well as would-be travelers.

“Just for this flight there was talk of 3,000 passengers in a three-month period,” Christian Chramer director of the Troms and Svalbard regions for the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise, told NRK. “It is basically a quiet period for tourism in Svalbard. It would have meant so much to bring in 3,000 more, both for increased capacity utilization, sales throughout the business community and it would have opened a larger share of the world market for Svalbard tourism.”

Tourism is seen as a critical industry for Longyearbyen’s economic future with nearly all local coal mining being shut down this year. Politicians and industry officials have stated they hope to double current visitor numbers, but Visit Svalbard Director Ronny Brunvoll stated the rejection of Finnair is a setback in efforts to lure new markets.

“It is not logical and this naive young man is actually shocked,” he wrote on his Facebook page. “Are we going to be able to develop tourism in Svalbard if we have these type (conscious or unconscious) of opposing forces identifying and eliminating it?”

Officials at the Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications, which would handle an appeal of the ruling, declined to comment about the situation, noting no appeal exists.

About Post Author

Mark Sabbatini

I'm a professional transient living on a tiny Norwegian island next door to the North Pole, where once a week (or thereabouts) I pollute our extreme and pristine environment with paper fishwrappers decorated with seemingly random letters that would cause a thousand monkeys with a thousand typewriters to die of humiliation. Such is the wisdom one acquires after more than 25 years in the world's second-least-respected occupation, much of it roaming the seven continents in search of jazz, unrecognizable street food and escorts I f****d with by insisting they give me the platonic tours of their cities promised in their ads. But it turns out this tiny group of islands known as Svalbard is my True Love and, generous contributions from you willing, I'll keep littering until they dig my body out when my climate-change-deformed apartment collapses or they exile my penniless ass because I'm not even worthy of washing your dirty dishes.
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

One thought on “Finnair grounded: Norway refuses to allow direct flights between Helsinki and Svalbard, citing 1978 agreement

  1. I can understand the reluctance to allow an influx of “outlanders” to such a remote place, and I can understand Norway’s use of a trump card which they’d had up their sleeve since 1978 to “kybosh” it. The place has few amenities, where pretty much everything needed to support a “modern western” person in the manner to which they are probably accustomed needs to be brought in from elsewhere. Most people from “somewhere else” would probably wind up doing something foolish, make a nuisance of themselves, or experience some sort of misadventure, which would end up costing someone other than themselves a lot of money and/ or give the place a bad reputation (casualty evacuation by aircraft, death due to exposure or animal attack, just to name two potential examples). This place isn’t like other exotic tourist destinations, which have people resorting to cutthroat tactics and fighting each other to provide visitors with hospitality.

Comments are closed.